KICKIN' AND SCREAMIN'...........

Dispensing truth in liberal does...and...where on April 14, 2009 I went to bed a conservative gun owner but awoke the next morning, according to the DHS, a possible member of a right wing extremist group needing to be watched.

July 2, 2009

Could This Be the Beginning of the End?

Look, tea parties aren’t going to change anything.  “Democrat, bad – Republican, good” thinking and voting isn’t going to change anything.  Outside of an armed insurrection, it just occurred to me that perhaps the only thing that could change anything is the press.  Yeah, that’s right, the Mainstream Media.  If you have the MSM on your side, you can do no wrong.  Conversely, if you piss them off, and they turn on you, that can have a massive effect on public opinion and, more importantly, perception.  Remember, perception is reality; reality is perception.  And the MSM, as we have seen throughout history, controls public perception.

Well, it appears that there could be some real “change” for the Obamastration, and it appears that it could be happening right in the White House Press Corps with the first salvo being fired by, of all people, Helen Thomas.

Helen Thomas: Not Even Nixon Tried to Control the Media Like Obama
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
By Penny Starr and Fred Lucas

(CNSNews.com) – Following a testy exchange during Wednesday’s briefing with White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas told CNSNews.com that not even Richard Nixon tried to control the press the way President Obama is trying to control the press.

“Nixon didn’t try to do that,” Thomas said. “They couldn’t control (the media). They didn’t try.

“What the hell do they think we are, puppets?” Thomas said. “They’re supposed to stay out of our business. They are our public servants. We pay them.”

Thomas said she was especially concerned about the arrangement between the Obama Administration and a writer from the liberal Huffington Post Web site. The writer was invited by the White House to President Obama’s press conference last week on the understanding that he would ask Obama a question about Iran from among questions that had been sent to him by people in Iran.

“When you call the reporter the night before you know damn well what they are going to ask to control you,” Thomas said.

“I’m not saying there has never been managed news before, but this is carried to fare-thee-well–for the town halls, for the press conferences,” she said. “It’s blatant. They don’t give a damn if you know it or not. They ought to be hanging their heads in shame.”

During today’s briefing, Thomas interrupted a back-and-forth between Gibbs and Chip Reid, the White House correspondent for CBS News, when Reid was questioning Gibbs about who was going to decide what questions would be asked of President Obama in a townhall meeting that was scheduled to take place in Annandale, Va., today.

Gibbs then had an exchange involving Reid and Thomas that went as follows:

Now, what does not come through by reading the words is the arrogant tone of Robert Gibbs and the pissed-off frustration of Helen Thomas, who is certainly not part of the “vast right-wing conspiracy.” Watch and listen for yourselves. Here’s the transcript of that exchange.

Gibbs: “… But, again, let’s–How about we do this? I promise we will interrupt the AP’s tradition of asking the first question. I will let you [Chip Reid] ask me a question tomorrow as to whether you thought the questions at the town hall meeting that the President conducted in Annandale—“

Chip Reid: “I’m perfectly happy to—”

Helen Thomas: “That’s not his point. The point is the control–”

Reid: “Exactly.”

Thomas: “We have never had that in the White House. And we have had some, but not– This White House.”

Gibbs: “Yes, I was going to say, I’ll let you amend her question.”

Thomas: “I’m amazed. I’m amazed at you people who call for openness and transparency and—”

Gibbs: “Helen, you haven’t even heard the questions.”

Reid: “It doesn’t matter. It’s the process.”

Thomas: “You have left open—”

Reid: “Even if there’s a tough question, it’s a question coming from somebody who was invited or was screened, or the question was screened.”

Thomas: “It’s shocking. It’s really shocking.”

Gibbs: “Chip, let’s have this discussion at the conclusion of the town hall meeting. How about that?”

Reid: “Okay.”

Gibbs: “I think—“

Thomas: “No, no, no, we’re having it now–”

Gibbs: “Well, I’d be happy to have it now.”

Thomas: “It’s a pattern.”

Gibbs: “Which question did you object to at the town hall meeting, Helen?”

Thomas: “It’s a pattern. It isn’t the question—”

Gibbs: “What’s a pattern?”

Thomas: “It’s a pattern of controlling the press.”

Gibbs: “How so? Is there any evidence currently going on that I’m controlling the press–poorly, I might add.”

Thomas: “Your formal engagements are pre-packaged.”

Gibbs: “How so?”

Reid: “Well, and controlling the public—”

Thomas: “How so? By calling reporters the night before to tell them they’re going to be called on. That is shocking.”

Gibbs: “We had this discussion ad nauseam and—”

Thomas: “Of course you would, because you don’t have any answers.”

Gibbs: “Well, because I didn’t know you were going to ask a question, Helen.
Go ahead.”

Thomas: “Well, you should have.”

Reporter: Thank you for your support.

Gibbs: “That’s good. Have you e-mailed your question today?”

Thomas: “I don’t have to e-mail it. I can tell you right now what I want to ask.”

Gibbs: “I don’t doubt that at all, Helen. I don’t doubt that at all.”

Bookmark and Share

by @ 6:59 pm. Filed under Guns, Religion/Philosophy

ClingtoTHIS

Bookmark and Share

THANK YOU BARACK OBAMA!!

As I mentioned earlier today, the market beshat itself early this morning. Now, however, things are worse as it has a severe case of diarrhea and is down 200 points.

All thanks to the wonderful actions put in place by Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his minions in Congress.

Happy 4th of July, America!

Bookmark and Share

Staff strip naked to improve morale. (?)

by @ 1:53 pm. Filed under Humor/Cartoons, Morons and Moonbats

Don’t know what you folks will make of this but …. isn’t it stupid?
Why would stripping naked at the office improve morale? I’m missing something here, aren’t I?
I think it’s one of those nutty things that someone wanted to do and needed the right excuse. Silly ppl. The world is well and truly mad.
But it is funny.

Staff at a design and marketing company in Newcastle spent a day working together naked after being told it would improve their morale.

By Ben Leach
Published: 12:00PM BST 02 Jul 2009

David Taylor, a business psychologist, told workers at design and marketing onebestway, in Newcastle upon Tyne, that a Naked Friday idea would boost their team spirit.

He was called in to help the firm after six staff members were forced into taking redundancies at the start of the credit crunch.

Mr Taylor told them that, by stripping off their clothes, staff could also strip away inhibitions and talk to each other more openly and honestly.

Psycho-babble. Call it anything they want to but it’s still psyco-babble. It’s funny psycho-babble but you know, a rose by any other name …
Catch the rest of the story and photo HERE.

Bookmark and Share

Taliban faction claims capture of US soldier in Afghanistan

by @ 12:13 pm. Filed under Islam, Muslims, Religion of Peace, Terrorists

I suppose this has been released in the US by now. ??
Oh boy. Not good.
Do ya suppose if we offered an apology? Right.
Just hope somehow and someway it might be possible to get him back alive and well. But with those shits in sheets, or whatever they wear that looks like it, we can never be certain.

A commander of the Taliban’s hardline Haqqani faction has claimed its militia has captured the US soldier missing from his base in eastern Afghanistan for three days.

By Ben Farmer in Kabul
BST 02 Jul 2009

The unnamed soldier had been missing from his unit since June 30.

While foreign journalists, contractors and missionaries, have repeatedly been kidnapped before, the missing soldier is believed to be the first member of the international coalition forces taken.

A spokeswoman for the US forces said no more details would be given in an attempt to protect the soldier.

He was not taking part in the large US offensive which began in Helmand province on Thursday morning.

Captain Elizabeth Mathias, a spokeswoman for US forces, said the military was using “all our resources to find him and provide for his safe return.”

Eastern Afghanistan hosts a complicated mix of allied insurgent groups all fighting against Hamid Karzai’s central government and his Western backers.

As well as remnants of the Taliban regime toppled in 2001, the region holds insurgent fighters led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar who commanded the biggest anti-Soviet faction during the 1980s invasion. The Haqanni network, led by Jalaluddin Haqqani, another former anti-Soviet commander, has been accused of kidnapping westerners before.

Eastern Afghanistan also holds foreign fighters drawn from the Gulf, Central Asia and the Caucuses.Hostages seized before have sometimes been taken across the border to Pakistan for safe keeping.

SOURCE

Bookmark and Share

Just something else to be angry about.

Notice I haven’t used the ‘F’ word yet.
What’s so damn interesting (to me) about this article is the fact that
environmental activists apparently believe that nobody has a right to fund what they don’t believe in. God how I hate those libtard bastards.
If I had my way ,,,, ok. This is Vilmar’s place and I’m a guest so I won’t go there. It’s just that I wish they’d stop breathing.

ExxonMobil funds climate-change sceptics
ExxonMobil, the world’s largest oil company, is continuing to fund researchers who cast doubt on global warming, despite public promises to cut support for climate-change sceptics.

By Malcolm Moore
Published: 12:58PM BST 02 Jul 2009

Company records for 2008 show that ExxonMobil gave $75,000 (£45,500) to the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) in Dallas, Texas and $50,000 (£30,551) to the Heritage Foundation in Washington.

It also gave $245,000 (£149,702) to the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research in Washington.

The list of donations in the company’s 2008 Worldwide Contributions and Community investments is likely to trigger further anger from environmental activists, who have accused ExxonMobil of giving tens of millions to climate change sceptics in the past decade.

“anger from environmental activists”
Like Exxon doesn’t have any rights to donate where and when they want to. Typical lefty libtard BS.

Read the rest of this entry…

Bookmark and Share

AMAZING HOW EASILY AMERICANS SWALLOW OBAMA’S LIES

The-Quicker-Fucker-Upper was in New York the other day lying his ass off to people who attended. No one challenged him.

 

 
He tells the crowd his stimulus is already working. And worse yet, that it will have no impact on the deficit!!!!!

Is this chutzpah or isn’t it? Somehow spending trillions of government money does add add to the deficit? Check out the chart below.

 

obama deficit

 

And where are all those jobs “saved or created” Obama? HUH? Where are they?

I’ll tell you….in the shitter. Another 467,000 jobs were lost. Some were quoting 16K PER DAY. They were not far off. The unemployment rate is at a 26 year high hitting 9.5 percent.

And the stock market, upon hearing that news, immediately beshat itself. We are now looking at another 3 digit loss for the day’s opening.

Of course, we can’t expect the media to blame Obama for any of this. Not when we read things like the Washington Post selling influence to lobbysits.

For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and association executives off the record, non-confrontational access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the paper’s own reporters and editors.

The astonishing offer is detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health-care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he feels it’s a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff.”

The offer—which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters—is a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.

And it’s a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The Washington Post for its ethical practices.

“Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate,” says the one-page flier. “Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth … Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama Administration and Congressional leaders …

“Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama Administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less. …

“Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters’ CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 … Hosts and Discussion Leaders … Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post … An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. … A Washington Post Salon … July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m.”

Thanks, Obama, you MFCSPOS!

Bookmark and Share

THIS IS WHAT PASSES FOR LAWMAKING IN LOUSY-ANA

At moments like these I am almost ashamed to admit these people are Americans. More like the “best of” Lousisiana’s idiots and morons. And for Christ’s sake, can you learn to speak proper English?
 

Bookmark and Share

MORE ON THE HEALTHCARE BILL

Did you know Nancy Pelosi does not want to give anyone time to read the health care bill?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) will not give the public a week to review the final text of a health-care reform bill before it is voted on later this year.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) has also declined to commit to giving the public a week to read and consider the final health-care bill.

At her press briefing on Thursday, Pelosi was asked whether the health-care bill would be handled differently than the stimulus bill, which came up in February. The 1,071-page final text of that bill was posted on the House Appropriations Committee’s Web site late on a Thursday night and then voted on the next day.

“When the stimulus bill came out earlier this year, members and citizens had less than two days to review the final version that came out of the conference committee before it was voted on,” CNSNews.com asked Pelosi on Thursday. “Will you commit to giving Americans at least a week to review the full conference version of the health care bill before it is voted on? And also will you commit to submitting the final version to the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] so that they can report the cost to the public?”

Pelosi would not commit to giving the public a week to review the bill, and did not respond to the question of having the CBO report on the cost of the final bill.

“Well, we will abide by the regular order. You heard the question,” she said. “It was about having the health care bill out there a week in advance. We will have the regular order in terms of the appropriate amount of time, 48 hours in advance for amendments before you file the bill, another day before you can take up the bill.

“But this bill is something that has been unfolding before the American people for a long time now. The areas of controversy are well known,” said Pelosi.

I know she (and her buttbuddies in the senate) surely won’t read it but what about those that do want to? And whatever happened to Obama’s promise to give Americans five days to read legislation before it’s passed? So far we did not have it for the “porkulus” bill nor the “cap and tax” bill.

redblue

Here’s one where the Democrats plan a strategy to prohibit Republican senators from filibustering the bill.

Mainstream Democrats close to Barack Obama are warning Republicans about insisting on too many changes to the president’s health care overhaul, saying the Democratic-controlled Congress will move ahead without GOP input if they do.

A strong-arm partisan approach may be unpleasant, these prominent Democrats say, but it is better than letting Republicans dictate spending cuts and insurance rules that many Democratic voters oppose.

For weeks, staunchly liberal groups have complained as key Senate Democrats insisted on a bipartisan approach, especially in the Finance Committee. The strategy is giving Republicans more clout than their minority status deserves, these critics said.

Now, similar comments are coming from veteran, pragmatic Democrats who have worked closely with Obama and his top aides. They reject the notion that a controversial Senate tactic _ “reconciliation,” which essentially bars the minority party from using filibusters to block legislation _ is unworkable or politically unacceptable in the health care debate.

“I would not hesitate to use it” if efforts at genuine bipartisanship fail, former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle said Monday.

The price that Senate Republicans are demanding so far is too high, said John Podesta, a White House chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and now head of the Center for American Progress. “There is a point at which you have to move on,” Podesta said, and reconciliation can be the vehicle when that time comes.

Unlike most liberal activists, Daschle and Podesta have direct ties to the White House’s innermost circles. Podesta headed Obama’s transition operation. Daschle was Obama’s choice to be “health czar” until income tax problems derailed the plan. Both men have written extensively on health care.

Daschle and Podesta noted they were not speaking for the administration when they met with reporters Monday to discuss their thoughts on Congress’s trillion-dollar effort to insure all Americans, control health care costs and revamp the system of incentives for doctors and hospitals.

But they didn’t pretend to be total outsiders. “We interact with them daily,” Daschle said of Obama’s health care advisers.

Their comments come at a crucial time in the debate. When the House and Senate return from a one-week recess on July 6, they will shift into overdrive to try to complete the outlines of a health care overhaul before the August break. Debate in the Senate could be particularly fierce, with liberals insisting on a robust public option for health insurance, and Republicans fighting it.

Whether true bipartisanship can emerge, or whether Democrats decide to bulldoze their way past Republicans, should become clear in what Daschle says will be a historic month.

He and Podesta rejected claims that the reconciliation process has too many parliamentary loopholes and complexities to be an effective tool for enacting a Democratic plan over near-unanimous Republican opposition. Reconciliation would not be easy, Daschle said, but “it’s certainly a viable fallback option.”

Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, a centrist Democrat who strongly supports a bipartisan approach, differs. “You’d be left with Swiss cheese,” he said in an interview.

And with that asshole, Al Franken, getting the nod from the moonbats in the Minnesota court system, maybe all this wrangling and finagling won’t be necessary.

redblue

Lastly, a singularly well-written piece equating one’s travails at the hands of technicians (doctors) and Radio Shack (the health care system.)

I’ll start you off:

As a Catholic I know I am not supposed to hate, but I hate radio shack. Hate it.

Bear with me. My Sirius Radio was on the fritz. I called the support line and the young man on the phone told me I needed to get a new antenna. I informed him that my radio had full bars but would get stuck with the message “acquiring signal.” After a full fifteen seconds of diagnosis the young man insisted it was the antenna. I told him I didn’t think so.

“Sir,” he said condescendingly “you need a new antenna. If you don’t get a new antenna I cannot help you!”

“Fine!”, says I. “Where can I pick one up?”

“Any Radio Shack should have them,” came the reply.

Nuts!

I hate Radio Shack. It seems I cannot go in to a Radio Shack with getting into an argument. I value independence and privacy. Radio Shack is determined to strip these from you. In many ways, Radio Shack is a microcosm of everything wrong with America these days. Let me tell you my tale(s) and then you may understand where I am coming from.

Let’s go back one year to the last time I went to Radio Shack. I was going on a trip and I lost my USB cable that I use to charge my Blackberry and I was leaving that night. I was near a Radio Shack and against my better judgment I went there to get it. I mean it was just a USB cable after all, should be simple enough.

I walked in the door and a pimply faced nineteen year old kid bounded up to me. “Welcome to Radio Shack, how can I help you?”

“Ok, where are your USB cables?”, I asked.

“What is it for sir, is it for a camera, a phone, or a printer?”, asks the kid.

“Its actually for a phone, but that doesn’t really matter. Can you just tell me where the USB cables are?”

“What kind of phone is it sir?”

“Listen son. Can you just tell me where the USB cables are?”

“Well sir, not all phones use the same kind of cable. Not all phones even use USB cables. If you don’t tell me what kind of phone you have I can’t help you!”

My voice rising I said, “You can help me by answering my question. Where are the USB cables?”

Now the manager, hearing my voice growing louder, comes over to smooth the situation. “Hello sir, can I help you?”

“I hope so. I asked your fella here four times but he refuses to answer what I think thinkis a rather simple question. Where are your USB cables?” I said rather tersely (which anyone who has known me for more than five minutes knows is an understatement.)

“What is the cable for?”, asked the manager.

At that point I nearly lost my mind. I eventually just walked away from them and found the cables myself. Since this was not my first such encounter at the Shack, I have avoided going back there. Sworn it off actually. However, since the Sirius support guy had told me that I could pick up the antenna at any RS and I had been without my radio for weeks, I figured I would brave those waters again. That was a mistake.
Read the rest of this entry…

Bookmark and Share

OBAMA, THE EPA, AND A COVERUP

A few days ago I wrote about how an EPA report was being held back by the Obama administration during the vote of the Cap and Trade bill in the House.

Here’s the video:
 

Bookmark and Share

DID YOU KNOW THE LENGTH OF OBAMA’S REACH?

I can only assume this story is true and, based on my little knowledge of Obama, would not be surprised to know his hands were elbow deep in this one where a jet that had President Bush’s name stenciled on it (he flew that particular jet) had the name taken off, the plane re-painted and the name NOT stenciled back on.

When George W. Bush was in the Texas Air National Guard, he was stationed at Ellington Field in Houston, Texas. At Ellington Field there are several retired aircraft on display. It has been reported that the F-102 on display at Ellington Field was the one then Lt Bush trained on when he was with the 147th Fighter Wing at Ellington Field.

For many years, the name “LT G W BUSH” was stenciled on the aircraft just below the cockpit, and I’ve seen it. However, after January 20, 2009, I noticed that “LT G W BUSH” had been painted over. I asked one of the senior officers of the 147th if Bush’s name had been deliberately removed. I was told that it was removed temporarily while the aircraft was being repainted. I accepted that explanation. Today I was back on Ellington Field, and I noticed that “LT G W BUSH” had not been restenciled onto the aircraft. I asked a member of the 147th why and their response was a laugh and a “What do you think?” So, it seems that now that Obama is President, the 147th has become politically correct and removed indicators that President Bush had served with them. This could be because now there is talk that the 147th at Ellington Field should be shut down. So much for loyalty among airmen.

I tried going to the Ellington Guard site but could not get access. So I went to the ANG site’s contact page and sent them this:

I just finished reading an article at www.debbieschlussel.com …her archives for june 30th since I can’t enter her complete address due to your server restrictions. The article is easily found as it has a picture of the jet….. In it she stated that the plane flown by President Bush, currently a static display model at Ellington, had his name painted over, apparently because it was to be re-painted. After the re-paint was done, his name was not painted back on. As of a couple of days ago, this is still true. When asked why not, a member there said, “What do you think?”

This leads me to believe a decision was made much higher than the base commander’s not to do this.

As a USAF retired CMSGT this troubles me.

I appreciate hearing back from someone soon.

Sincerely,

Let’s see if they respond.

Bookmark and Share

I SEE THEIR POINT BUT PREFER A DIFFERENT TARGET GROUP

Go on, call me a Hitler Wannabe. But whereas I am against virtually everything the government of Rwanda stands for, this idea, if true, might have merit. Especially if it were practiced on a few democrats.

Rwanda has strongly denied reports that its parliament is considering a draft law which would forcibly sterilise people who are mentally disabled.

Damascene Ntawukuriryayo, deputy speaker of parliament, was responding to a call by US-based activists Human Rights Watch to scrap the proposed law.

He also told the BBC that plans for HIV testing before couples get married are strictly voluntary, not compulsory.

Mr Ntawukuriryayo said the lobby group should check before releasing reports.

He said he had never seen a bill or provision which proposed forcible sterilisation.

Earlier, HRW’s Joe Amon had said: “Provisions in the current bill that increase stigma, rely on coercion and deny… reproductive rights should be removed.”

Forced sterilisation is regarded as a crime against humanity by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Rwanda has successfully managed to lower the spread of Aids in recent years thanks to its HIV campaign, according to World Bank figures.

Oh, as for that last paragraph: I wonder if the authors bothered to check HOW it was accomplished. Somehow I doubt it was done through an education campaign. More like a forced purge requiring a bullet to the head of this with HIV.

Bookmark and Share

HAIRLESS CAT COVETS HAIR

by @ 6:36 am. Filed under Animals/Wildlife, Music/Videos

 

H/T: NEATORAMA

Bookmark and Share

GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE

In the past I’ve been pretty critical of my local Congresswoman. I believe my criticisms were valid.

But I recently came across a letter she wrote our local paper regarding the latest “cap and tax” bill about to hit the senate which, if passed, would financially rape America. The paper, obviously, being an arm of the Obama administration, fully agreed with the bill.

Check out the bitch slapping she gives them.

Full Disclosure: I did not get this letter directly from her but from a trusted friend who got it from her office.

Mr. Neil Brown
Vice President & Executive Editor
St. Petersburg Times

Mr. Brown,

Last week, the House voted on climate legislation that Nancy Pelosi heralded as a landmark and this paper claimed is vital for Florida. Unfortunately the column in this paper so misreported the cost estimated by the Congressional Budget Office that I feel compelled to issue a correction on the papers behalf. The editors trumpet the cost as $15 per household, per month. That is a flat out misrepresentation of analysis. The lowCBO estimate was based on a refundable tax credit, which was removed from the bill. Further, only folks with the monopolist senses of a newspaper editor could claim that a tax on your utility bill is a value that you can pass downto your consumers.

The Democrats reached a low upfront cost by; you guessed it, adding more to the national debt. Had the authors of the editorial bothered to read the CBO brief, they would have seen that the legislation would really cost $28,825. Thats right, the $165 dollars youll pay for the first five years of the CBO score, plus the $28,000 per person this bill would add to our national debt. Finally, the bill is designed with formulas that would penalize Florida. The $165 average is a national average, so seniors in Florida will pay a lot more than the residents of California, who will pay almost nothing.

I do not like to complain about process, but unbelievably this bill was not even complete before the vote took place. In fact, pages of text were in piles being passed around the Speakers desk by clerks. Who knows what we voted on? Members of Congress sure didnt, and neither did the editors. Putting aside the probity of passing legislation that no one has read, let alone assembled, this bill does almost nothing to lead to energy independence. In fact, it has been reported by Bloomberg that if this became law, America would be more dependant on foreign oil then ever before.

Keep in mind all of this is just a starting point. Apparently, were to believe that having the President regulate every bulb, every lamp, every appliance, every by-law in your home-owner and condo association, and the location of the outlets in your home is also just a starting point. One wonders, where will this finish?

Its not that I dont think we need to take action to protect our environment. On the contrary, when Democrats first took over Congress I sided with their initial efforts to bring balance to the carbon-centric approach of Americas energy policy. I have a long record of supporting conservation, even winning recognition from the Sierra Club for my efforts to protect our precious water resources. But, I have always fought for pragmatic improvements that will improve our environment and our economy. I believe strongly that we can green the economy and grow it, but drastically higher taxes will do neither.

I do agree with the editors that we should all step up and do what we can. That is why I am calling on the St. Petersburg Times to cease the publication of its printed edition. The carbon footprint of the largest paper in circulation in Floridamust be enormous. Forests have been felled to print crossword puzzles and Sunday comics. Countless barrels of foreign oil have been guzzled to transport this energy hog to your door. New technologies have made news delivered on paper obsolete and outdated. Craigslist proves we no longer need printed classifieds and the Internet provides limitless column space with little carbon emission. Instead of the taxpayer paying to replant trees cut down to make paper, a subsidy in the bill endorsed by this paper, an online only edition would leave our forests standing. So to the publisher of the St. Pete Times, I challenge you to be a leader and step up to the plate. After all, eliminating your print edition wont (sic) stop global warming, but it would be a good start.

Sincerely,

Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite
Member of Congress

Bookmark and Share

STILL RESOLVING…..

by @ 6:34 am. Filed under Hollyweirdoes, Humor/Cartoons

Q: Why did Michael Jackson cross the road?
A: He saw someone blowing bubbles and thought he’d join in.

Q: Heard about Michael Jackson’s new songs?
A: I’m forever blowing bubbles!

Q: What would you call Michael Jackson if he slept with another 20 or 30 young boys?
A: Monsigneur.

Q: What do Michael and Catholic school nuns have in common?
A: Both are a pain in the ass to kids.

Q: Why did Michael Jackson fail to renew his contract with Pepsi?
A: Because he found out that the main ingredient was Bubbles!

Q: What do Michael Jackson and broccoli have in common?
A: Both are force fed to little boys.

Q: What was Michael Jackson thinking about on his wedding night?
A: Hmmm, now Lisa-Marie can give me a little boy of my own.

Q: What’s the difference between Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley?
A: About two dress sizes!!!

Bookmark and Share

THESE GUYS HAVE NERVES OF STEEL…AND DAMNED FINE FLYING SKILLS

by @ 6:32 am. Filed under Cars/Trucks/Aviation, Music/Videos

 

H/T: THEO

Bookmark and Share

JUST FOR CHUCKLES

by @ 6:30 am. Filed under Humor/Cartoons

 

chuckles

 

Bookmark and Share

July 1, 2009

Mob grief proves Britain is more wacko than Jacko

by @ 10:11 am. Filed under Morons and Moonbats

I thought I should, in fact I thought I’m obligated to post this as I think Screamers will appreciate it. Well, most will. But especially I thought Vilmar would fall down reading this as it’s pretty much in line with something he wrote a few days ago. Must say though, the way idiots are carrying on one might think the sky was really falling. And Littlejohn really does nail it well. From everything I’ve seen the last couple of days and reading the critical comments about the weepy eyed no personal lives kinda ppl, Littlejohn has said it best of all.
See for yourself. I’m only posting part of it here. Don’t miss the entire thing.

A vomit-inducing display of sentimentality and exhibitionism.
By Richard Littlejohn
Last updated at 1:51 AM on 01st July 2009

When the head of RCA Records was told that Elvis had died, he is said to have remarked: ‘Great career move.’

His modern counterpart at Sony must have entertained similar sentiments after being informed that Michael Jackson had popped his pumps.

Since the news of Wacko Jacko’s death Twittered out of Los Angeles, his albums have gone platinum all over again. The megastore shelves have been stripped bare, the Amazons and eBays looted of Jackson memorabilia.

A JERK

People who hadn’t bought a Michael Jackson CD for a quarter of a century, some who had never possessed a Michael Jackson record, were suddenly overcome with a compelling urge to fill their boots with his back catalogue.

For some unfathomable reason, they felt a primeval need to touch the hem of his garment, to lay their hands on a piece of the legend, to be able to tell their grandchildren that they were there; to give them something to occupy their attention until the next series of Britain’s Got Talent.

The inconvenient fact that this was someone they didn’t know, who lived on a compound thousands of miles away, wasn’t going to stand between them and their inalienable right to emote in public.

He was, like, awzum. We love you, Michael!

While there were displays of sympathy across the world, no one managed to pull it off with quite such sphincter-tightening mawkishness as the British.

In Central London, the provisional wing of the Friends of Dorothy and the usual coven of madwomen took to the streets in a vomit-inducing display of sentimentality and exhibitionism.

Just a note: There’s lots more on other subjects at this link. This fellow writes the truth.

Read the rest of this entry…

Bookmark and Share

ANSWER ME THIS….

I can’t remember if I heard this on Beck’s or Limbaugh’s show yesterday but the question is valid as hell:

Given that liberals/democrats/socialists in the US have been clamoring for the pullout of US troops from Iraq under the guise that it is time Iraq stands on its own two feet and that we should stop supporting them……..then why is it they do not say the same thing about welfare recipients here in the US? Isn’t it about time we cut THEIR funding and make them stand on their own two feet?”

What say you?

Bookmark and Share

EYE CANDY

by @ 6:52 am. Filed under Eye Candy

 

EYE CANDY

 

Bookmark and Share

WHILE CAPITALIST USA IS CONSIDERING RAISING TAXES……….

…..we have a formerly communist country LOWERING taxes in order to perk up their economy.

Hungary’s minority Socialist government passed a crucial test on Monday when parliament approved key 2010 tax changes to help the country recover from its worst recession in almost two decades.

The passing of the law averts the risk of early elections. Prime Minister Gordon Bajnai had said he would stay in his post as long as the Socialists and the Free Democrats support his programme, which is also the backbone of Hungary’s financing deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The tax law, which will cut personal income taxes and social contributions paid by employers to the government, was passed with 211 votes and 152 votes against, with backing from the Socialists’ former coalition allies, the Free Democrats.

Bajnai’s government, which took office in April, has cut spending and kept the budget deficit in check. This has helped the forint to firm from all-time lows hit versus the euro in March, and helped rebuild some investor trust in Hungary.

“This confidence is still very fragile,” Bajnai told parliament ahead of the tax vote.

“The measures on which we vote today, and the ones the government will propose over the summer and in the autumn, are needed for this confidence to be lasting,” he added.

Parliament also passed a law which will provide for a “wealth tax” on real estate and luxury items next year.

The government will cut personal income tax rates and raise the lower income bracket to ensure that average incomes are taxed at a 17 percent rate, and will reduce the employment tax to encourage employers to save and create jobs.

Of course, Hungary has not learned the lessons of yaxing luxury items but I give them credit for lowering income taxes. Something our asshole of a President and his minions in Congress (both Democrat and Republican) do not quite understand.

And while they are not communists (yet), heavily socialist Germany is going to cut its taxes, too!

German Chancellor Angela Merkel defended her plan to cut taxes despite the country’s soaring budget deficit as she introduced her conservative alliance’s manifesto ahead of national elections in September.

Lower incomes taxes would “provide motivation” and encourage economic growth, Ms. Merkel told a conference of her party, the Christian Democratic Union, and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union.

The conservative parties’ election platform promises tax cuts worth €15 billion ($21 billion), but gives no time frame. The parties plan to cut the lowest income tax rate to 12% from 14% at present, raise the threshold for paying the top income tax rate of 42%, and reduce the degree to which a rising income leads to a progressively higher tax rate.

Sure makes you wonder about ther motivations of those in power in the administration and whether they really are patriotic to America or care more for its demise.

Bookmark and Share

THE FACE OF THE SENATE

This is it (with the added bonus that we now have competition for Barney Frank in the House, too.)

 

frankenfranken

 

NPR must have had 7 stories or versions of it this morning about Al “big fat idiot” Franken getting selected for the senate by Minnesota judges.

The left is orgasming in waves over how they now have a filibuster proof senate.

We are witnessing the decline and fall of the US.

Bookmark and Share

OBAMA, THE NEW MARIE ANTOINETTE?

That’s the conclusion I came to upon reading this story about Obama having a luau at taxpayer expense.

In a nod to his first home state, President Barack Obama will host the first-ever Hawaii-style luau on the White House lawn, complete with real Island cuisine, hula and music. The Thursday luau is pretty much all the Hawaii-born-and-raised president’s idea—his revamping, of sorts, of the annual White House Congressional picnic for members of Congress and their families.

Award-winning Hawaii-based chef Alan Wong is crafting the luau’s menu of contemporary Hawaiian cuisine, making use of as much Island-grown produce as he can get to D.C. The chef’s Honolulu eatery, Alan Wong’s Restaurant, has been a favorite dinner choice of the Obama’s on recent visits to Oahu.

The South Lawn luau will also feature hula and music from Hawaii and the South Pacific by Honolulu-based entertainment company Tihati Productions. Daily newspaper The Honolulu Advertiser reported this morning that White House planners specifically requested Tihati add Samoan fire-knife dancers to the entertainment lineup. They’ll get six of ‘em—doing a fire-knife dance pyramid.

The fire-knife dancers will join a troupe of about 20 musicians and dancers, picked from Tihati luau shows throughout Hawaii.

No word was immediately available on luau dinner menu specifics or any Oval Office requests for specific Hawaii grinds. But we did get our hands on Alan Wong’s partial shopping list, which seemed well-stocked for feeding 2,200 hungry politicos and their kin.

Click the link to check out the menu.

Meanwhile, we are being told to scrimp and save and start our own gardens to cut costs. We are told to save gas by buying locally. We are told to have “staycations” rather than travel.

And this MFCSPOS has a LUAU?!?!?!?!

Funny how the media says nothing about this but criticized President Bush incessantly for wasting taxpayer money by staying so many times at Camp David.

Bookmark and Share

A STUDY IN CONTRASTS

I found this video of Admiral Yamamoto’s plane getting shot down in WW II. For those of you who failed history in school in the 60s and early 70s or those of you who graduated afterwards, never hearing the name or seeing it in a text book, Yamamoto was the engineer of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

A short history of what took place is here. This is what caught my eye:

The Japanese government did not announce Yamamoto’s death until 21 May. To cover up the fact that the Allies were reading Japanese code, American newspapers published a story that civilian coast watchers in the Solomons saw Yamamoto boarding a bomber in the area. The Japanese apparently bought into the story, and did not change their code.

Can you even imagine our media doing anything like this today? I can’t. What I CAN see is the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, MSNBC, etc. all lining up to denounce America as imperialist war mongers attacking a man making a trip to boost the morale of his soldiers.

 

Bookmark and Share

Some Thoughts on the Iraq Pull-out

No, it’s not a new birth control technique.

Ok, so the Iraq draw-down has begun. The lefties, the MSM, the America haters et.al. are having multiple orgasms over that, but they are not alone. While I and many, many others like myself feel nothing that resembles erotic stimulation, however, I am happy to see it as well, and before we go any further, let’s get a few things on the table right now. What may appear to be negative in the analysis is not directed at the troops – far from it, as anybody who “knows” me can attest to. Our men and women on the ground, in the air, and on the seas have paid a very high price, and they deserve our unwavering respect for doing what they signed-up to do – follow orders. With that said, I have had a problem with our US foreign policy for quite some time, regardless of the administration, regardless of the situation or location. For the record, along with every male in my family since WWII, I was a “troop” (USMC), having been on the wrong end of rifles, RPGs, and a few machetes. Semper Fi.

Far too often we have sent our young men (and of late, women) half-way around the world to “defend democracy” or “fight for our freedoms back home,” and, frankly, that is just complete rubbish. That is a sales pitch to engender support from “the folks.” Indeed, it would be a lot more difficult to “sell” such actions abroad to the American people if the “real” reasons were told; hell, in many cases it would have been strategically foolhardy to do so. Iraq and Afghanistan are perfect examples. Do you really think our government gives two shits about democracy in either of those places? Believe what you want, but the answer is “no.” WE backed Saddam in his war against Iran, knowing full well how he came to power (hint: it was not through anything that resembles the democratic process) and the kind of leader he was. WE backed the mujahadeen/mujahideen in Afghanistan, led in no small part by Osama Bin Laden, in their war against the Soviets. And the argument is valid that the Machiavellian principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” applied in dealing with what was known or believed at the time to be a greater threat in both cases. Look at a map of the region, and you will see that both Iraq and Afghanistan are strategically situated for a variety of purposes. In an attempt to secure “friendly” regimes (and I use that term loosely) in both places one can conjure several scenarios, but I submit with a good deal of certainty that concern for the plight of the people in the face of tyranny and oppression is not one of them.

One could argue that the long range goals of politicians and their lap dog barracks-grade officers at the Pentagon would have positive residual effects for the welfare of the people and the security of the US, but the field-grade officers and their NCOs know that those long range plans seldom (if ever) go as planned given that short-term plans on the battlefield more often than not go awry as soon as the boots hit the ground. Just ask US Army General (Ret.) Hal Moore, Korean War veteran and innaugural commander (Colonel at the time) of the then-newly-formed Army Air Cav, how he felt before and after the initial battle at Ia Drang in Vietnam (the first “official” battle in which LBJ revealed full US commitment there). You would have gotten the same answer from the late, legendary USMC Gen. “Chesty” Puller, Patton, and even that psychotic loser, Custer (who learned the hard way): Plans are nothing; planning is everything; and when all that fails, those who can adapt best by drawing from historical precedent and instinct to the fluid nature of combat will prevail. Which brings us to the central theme of the argument.

Why do we who value and hold dear our freedom and liberty feel as we do? Because we know it did not come easily. It was not given to us. It was earned, fought and paid for with blood and countless lives of our forebearers. I am speaking specifically about our Revolution and the birth of our Nation, but we cannot forget the massive loss of life our nation endured during the War Between the States, better known as the Civil War (or, as some still call it, the War of Northern Aggression). To a lesser extent in terms of defense of our liberty (not in terms of sacrifice and loss of life and blood) WWI comes into play (although our security was not really at risk), as does WWII, the last war fought in defense of our liberty. Let me stress again that the sacrifice of those who fought in Korea and Vietnam was no less noble or honorable than any of those who came before or since; only that, through no fault of their own, what they fought and died for had nothing to do with preserving our liberty. The point here is that we have paid for our liberty with countless sacrifice.

Why, then, should we believe that we can “give” freedom, liberty, or democracy to those who have not or are not willing to fight and die for it themselves? Can anybody point to a case in history where that has been successful in the long term?

WARNING: Harsh language to follow.

I hope that I am wrong, but I don’t give Iraq very long. “Yay, Saddam is gone!” “Woo-Hoo! The dictator is dead!” – Big fucking deal; there will be ten others lining up to take his place, starting with that fuck Muqtada al Sadr. And there are dozens more around the world. Fuck them all. And this is where I get very upset. I see these guys (and women too) all blown to shit, as I recently watched on this special, “Home from Iraq”, hosted by James Gandolfini. It wasn’t skewed, biased, or anything else. These men and women spoke openly, not complaining, and Gandolfini listened, offering very little input, except for hugs and handshakes after each interview. I cried, watching these folks with no arms, no legs, faces blown apart, one with a plate in his fucking head, reduced to speaking like a child. You know why I cried, clenching my fists, unable to speak to my wife or face my step-children for the rest of the night? Because I know that these men and women (yeah, one woman was in a convoy and took an RPG right through the shoulder) suffered the unthinkable terrors of war for nothing. It’s a long bow to draw to say that they suffer and the other 4,000 some-odd have died defending our freedom and security. Bullshit. That’s for the cheerleaders at Fox and other chickenhawks to spew. And the only other ones who piss me off more than them are the America haters at CNN, MSNBC, NYT, LA Times, WaPo, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the UN, and the various foreign media and government officials (not to mention our own lefties and America haters in Congress) who bemoan the deaths of Iraqi civilians and paint our guys and gals as baby killers and torturers.

I don’t want to see another one of our folks blown to shit, regardless of how proud they are, unless it’s in DIRECT defense of our liberty and our nation, not some half-assed, concocted justification or after-the-fact rationalization that soothsayers use to make us feel better.

You really want to help the Iraqis and now, perhaps, the Iranians? Pick a side, and give them weapons to fight for their own freedom. Oh, wait, that’s just what got us into this mess in the first place. Leaving them alone isn’t the answer, either. That’s what the past 30 years have gotten us to now. No, the only options I see as viable are to either blow them all to hell, or selectively assassinate key personnel and destroy hideouts using Special Ops. I just know that massive use of military force to “win hearts and minds” has been tried before, and each time it has failed.

Good luck to the Iraqis.  They’ll need it.

Bookmark and Share

[KICKIN' AND SCREAMIN'……….. is proudly powered by WordPress.]